Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 SW2D 778 - Ex Parte Franklin

Ex Parte Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably Tyra v. State (1995), Davis v. State (1995)

26 state decisions

160198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Polk v. State · Simpkins v. State · Jackson v. State · Ex Parte Patterson · Denham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) a firearm or anything manifestly designed, made, or adapted for the purpose of inflicting death or serious bodily injury; or (B) anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(3) “Firearm” means any device designed, made, or adapted to expel a projectile through a barrel by using the energy generated by an explosion or bum-ing substance or any device readily convertible to that use ... (10) “Short-barrel firearm” means a rifle with a barrel length of less than 16 inches or ... any weapon made from a shotgun or rifle ... (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a firearm or anything manifestly designed, made, or adapted for the purpose of inflicting death or serious bodily injury[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.