Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 758 F.2d 1114 - in Re the Yoder Company

in Re the Yoder Company’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
3
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Barbara Sheridan v. Ei Dupont De Nemours and Company Jacques Amblard (1996), In re Longardner & Associates, Inc. (1988)

10 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

54019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hagner v. United States · City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · Legille v. Dann · Magouirk Mac Fasson Division of Avery International Corporation v. Magouirk Mac · Reeves v. General Foods Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a presumption of receipt [of a mailing] arises upon proof that the item was addressed properly, had sufficient postage, and was deposited in the mail.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a presumption vanishes entirely once rebutted, and the question must be decided as any ordinary question of fact”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Generally, evidence of non-receipt is insufficient to rebut the presumption of receipt under the mailbox rule, but it does present a triable question of fact whether the letter was properly sent .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.