Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 758 F.2d 1578 - Maier v. Orr

Maier v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis

758 F.2d 1578 · 1985

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Lam v. University of Hawai'i (1994), Sierra Club v. Simkins Industries, Inc. (1988)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

21019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 372 · 28 U.S.C. § 455 · 5 U.S.C. § 5534 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity · Barrett v. Zweibon · Perini v. Downey · Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]bsent a factual showing of a reasonable basis for questioning his or her impartiality, or allegations of facts establishing other disqualifying circumstances, a judge should participate in cases assigned. Conclusory statements are of no effect____ Frivolous and improperly based suggestions that a judge recuse should be firmly declined, [citaions omitted] Nor does mere prior association form a reasonable basis for questioning a judge’s impartiality.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “mere prior association does not form reasonable basis for questioning a judge's impartiality”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.