Liddell v. Board of Education of City of St Louis Board of Education of City of St Louis State of Missouri’s Empirical Analysis
758 F.2d 290 · 1985
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Milliken v. Bradley · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship · Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“City Board is to prepare a capital improvements plan, not exceeding $40,000,-000.00, to address the needs of the non-integrated schools especially. Upon district court approval, the City Board is to submit a $20,000,000.00 bond issue to the voters to be matched by the State. If the bond issue fails to receive the necessary two-thirds majority, then judgment is to be entered against the City Board and the State in equal amounts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The City Board is to prepare promptly a building program not to exceed $40,000,-000.00 to meet the most urgent capital needs of the district, with emphasis on the all-black schools and the magnet schools.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“these requirements apply to both the specialized and the general curriculum of the magnet schools.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.