Shah v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
758 F.3d 32 · 2014
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Raza v. Gonzales · Fesseha v. Ashcroft · Smith v. Holder · Roberts v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arguments not raised before the BIA are waived due to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he BIA could not have, as petitioner argues, abused its discretion in overlooking details of the Country Report where the report was not even in the administrative record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“show that the BIA committed an error of law or exercised its judgment in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.