Klay v. Panetta’s Empirical Analysis
758 F.3d 369 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Feres v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shift toward disfavoring judicially implied causes of action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.