Beardsley v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
758 F.3d 834 · 2014
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Clifford v. Apfel · Sarchet v. Chater · Zurawski v. Halter · Craft v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is entitled to benefits,”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“build an accurate and logical bridge between the evidence and the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lambert v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.