758 F. Supp. 2d 1154 - Amazon. Com LLC v. Lay’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2710 (§ 2 of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988) · 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United States v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Arguments cannot be raised properly for the first time on reply.” Amazon.com LLC v. Lay, 758 F.Supp.2d 1154, 1171 (W.D.Wash. 2010); see also Zamani v. Carnes, 491 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir.2007) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.