Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 758 N.E.2d 1019 - Beard v. Beard

Beard v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Marriage of Collier v. Collier · Lizak v. Schultz · Fratus v. Marion Community Schools Board of Trustees · State Ex Rel. Paxton v. Porter Superior Court · Akers v. Akers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall presume that an equal division of the marital property between the parties is just and reasonable. However, this presumption may be rebutted by a party who presents relevant evidence, including evidence concerning the following factors, that -an equal division would not be just and reasonable: (1) The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of the property, regardless of whether the contribution was income producing. (2) The extent to which the property was acquired by each spouse: (A) before the marriage; or (B) through inheritance or gift. (3) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the disposition of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family residence or the right to dwell in the family residence for such periods as the court considers just to the spouse having custody of any children. (4) The conduct of the parties during the marriage as related to the disposition or dissipation of their property. (5) The earnings or earning ability of the parties as related to: (A) a final division of property; and (B) a final determination of the property rights of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “acknowledged what it termed three narrow exceptions to the rule: (1) a spouse may seek modification of a property settlement following the entry during the life of the two parties of the decree of dissolution based on the deceased spouse's fraudulent underreporting of his assets to the court, (2) the deceased spouse's attorney may recoup from the surviving spouse fees and expenses incurred in preparing the case (the exact opposite of this case) [ FN ], and (3) the deceased spouse's estate may petition to have child support arrearages reduced to judgment by the dissolution court following the entry of the decree of dissolution. None of those seenarios applies in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Bifurcation is a process created by statute that allows a trial judge to complete a dissolution in two separate phases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.