Alfred v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2026
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 51 Cal. 2d 371 - In Re Osslo · State v. Montgomery · 116 Ill. App. 3d 695 - People v. Mowery · State v. Randolph · 83 Ill. App. 3d 951 - People v. Patrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fairness requires that the court adhere to the terms of its agreement, and conduct a probation revocation hearing, not a contempt hearing”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Asuncion · Finn v. State“We therefore conclude that the court may not invoke its contempt power to punish a defendant for a probation violation, at least when the defendant has not been warned of this possibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Finn v. State“contempt of court was the only sanction permissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.