Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 758 SO2D 1 - Maples v. State

Maples v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2018 · most notably Maples v. Thomas (2012), Hall v. State (1999)

1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

310199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Agurs · United States v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Urioso v. State · Stephens v. State
  2. “' Self v. State, 620 So.2d 110, 113 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) (quoting Porter v. State, 520 So.2d 235, 237 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987)); see also Beard v. State, 612 So.2d 1335 (Ala.Cr.App.1992); Alexander v. State, 601 So.2d 1130 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Waldrop v. State · Hall v. State
  3. “"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review . . . whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Henderson v. State · 795 So. 2d 753 - Williams v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.