Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

758 So. 2d 1209

Dudley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-05-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2007

2 state decisions

Relies on 741 So. 2d 1125 - State v. Sullivan · 727 So. 2d 314 - McKnight v. State · State v. Wise

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder. Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of his cocaine use nor when it denied his motions for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial. We affirm his sentence pursuant to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act on the authority of Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), and State v. Wise, 744 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, 741 So.2d 1137 (Fla.1999). We certify that this court’s decision in State v. Wise conflicts with McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

¶2AFFIRMED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ. concur.
/758/so2d/1209 · .json · Public domain