758 So. 2d 283 - State v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · State v. Cook · State v. Polkey · 445 So. 2d 1155 - State v. Humphrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a statutory requirement rather than a constitutional requirement (as is the requirement that the trial court inform the Defendant of the three Boykin rights)”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“BY MRS. MEYERS [Assistant District Attorney] He is charged with Manslaughter for the death of Ms. Jacobs, whoever commits Manslaughter shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not more than 40 years and on the Aggravated Battery for the injury of the child, Aggravated Battery is a battery committed with a dangerous weapon and whoever commits an aggravated battery shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than 10 years or both. BY THE COURT: Alright, Mr. Chapman [defense counsel], are you satisfied with the reading of the maximum penalty and are you further satisfied with the factual basis that is set forth by Mrs. Meyers [assistant district attorney], and are you further satisfied that there be sufficient evidence to prove the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? BY MR. CHAPMAN: Yes, Your Honor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In order to insure adequate review by the appellate court, there must be an indication in the record that the trial court considered both the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in La. Code Crim.P. art. 894.1 in determining the defendant's particular sentence. State v. Davis, 449 So.2d 452 (La.1984). It is well established that the trial court need not articulate every factor of Article 894.1. However, the record must establish that the terms set forth therein have been adequately considered. The record must reveal some indication that the trial court considered the guidelines set forth in Article 894.1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.