Johnston v. Parham’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 418 So. 2d 764 - McKee v. McKee · 547 So. 2d 766 - Nichols v. Tedder · 622 So. 2d 1226 - Crow v. Crow · 708 So. 2d 55 - Mizell v. Mizell · 723 So. 2d 1175 - Andrews v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Chancellors are vested with broad discretion, and this Court will not disturb the chancellor's findings unless the court's actions were manifestly wrong, the court abused its discretion, or the court applied an erroneous legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“receive credit for having paid child support where, in fact, he paid the support directly to or for the benefit of the child, where to hold otherwise would unjustly enrich the mother.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.