Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

758 So. 2d 723

Docket No. 4D00-0964.

Rivero v. State

Lazaro B. RIVERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-04-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2001

4 state decisions

Relies on Heggs v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Lazaro B. Rivero, Jasper, pro se.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Lazaro Rivero appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, in which he sought resentencing under Heggs v. State,759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000)(slip op.). We affirm the denial because his motion does not allege the date of his offense, and therefore does not demonstrate that his case fell within the window period during which Chapter 95-184 was unconstitutional. Affirmance is without prejudice to Rivero to file a new motion in the trial court that alleges the date of his offense and shows that he has standing to challenge his sentence on this ground.

¶5WARNER, C.J., STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

/758/so2d/723 · .json · Public domain