758 So. 2d 749 - State v. Castleberry’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
139
cited by 139 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
138 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pulley v. Harris · 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar · 664 So. 2d 94 - State v. Johnson · 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque · 559 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Wille
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if there is evidence that confirms material points in an accomplice's tale, and confirms the defendant's identity and some relationship to the situation.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hughes · State v. Hatch“[E]xcept for instances in which the mandatory mistrial provisions of La. C.Cr.P. art. 770 are applicable, [the remedy] should only be used when substantial prejudice to Defendant is shown.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[f]inally, a defendant is not entitled to relief because of an incomplete record absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the transcripts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.