Juarez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
97 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Woods v. State (1997), Garcia v. State (1994)
97 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Coolidge v. New Hampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) whether Miranda warnings were given; 2) the temporal proximity of the arrest and the confession; 3) the presence of intervening circumstances; and 4) the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Darden v. State“Notwithstanding an illegal arrest, one of the recognized exceptions to the requirement of both a warrant and probable cause for a valid search is a search authorized by consent freely and voluntarily given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woodberry v. State“[T]here is no per se rule prohibiting the use of evidence obtained as a result of a consent search following an illegal arrest, stop or detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Munera v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.