Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 758 SW2D 953 - Otis Elevator Co. v. Bedre

Otis Elevator Co. v. Bedre’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2001

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

30198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mobil Chemical Company v. Bell · Lemos v. Montez · Bell Helicopter Co. v. Bradshaw · Miller v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co. · Hebert v. Loveless

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this case, the Otis elevator in question had not been sent back to an Otis maintenance and repair shop; nor had the elevator been placed in one of Otis’ own authorized service stations. Otis had not regained possession or title to the elevator in question; nor had Otis issued any direct, unequivocal orders or authorizations to replace certain parts or systems on the elevator. In Bell Helicopter Co., supra, these compelling, paramount facts existed. Furthermore, no jury finding exists that the elevator in question was defective when it left the possession of Otis and entered into the stream of commerce. In fact, Otis lost control and possession of the elevator when it was sold in 1961. Otis never regained control or possession in the same manner as did Bell Helicopter Company. (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.