Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 F.2d 1241 - Ce Services Inc v. Control Data Corporation

Ce Services Inc v. Control Data Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

759 F.2d 1241 · 1985

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc. (1990), Access Telecom, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. (1999)

22 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

2901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of one or more of these [ Brown Shoe ] indices does not necessarily preclude a summary determination that certain products or services either are reasonably interchangeable or demonstrate a high cross-elasticity of demand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Only 'fair' competition will do, for 'if there is sharp dealing or overreaching or other conduct below the behavior of fair men similarly situated, the ensuing loss should be redressed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a ubiquitous price differential of some 20-25%”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.