Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 F.2d 432 - Davis v. Heckler

Davis v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

759 F.2d 432 · 1985

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Johnson v. Bowen (1988), Lovelace v. Bowen (1987)

18 federal appellate ·

2801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Brady v. Heckler · Stone v. Heckler · Epps v. Harris · Cook v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A]n impairment can be considered as not severe only if it is a slight abnormality which has such minimal effect on the individual that it would not be expected to interfere with the individual's ability to work, irrespective of age, education or work experience.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether objective medical impairments could reasonably be expected to produce the pain complained of.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “slight neurosis, slight impairment of sight or hearing, or other slight abnormality or combination of abnormalities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.