Rosinski v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
759 F.2d 539 · 1985
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Case (1991), Donaldson v. Bernstein (1997)
12 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 524
Relies on Frank v. Arnold · Stark v. St. Mary's Hospital · Friendly Finance Discount Corp. v. Jones · Matter of Zablocki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A debtor “may be prevented from [reopening to] amend ... her schedule only if her failure to include a creditor on the original schedule can be shown to have prejudiced ... [the creditor] in some way or to have been part of a scheme of fraud or intentional design.””
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under the Code, only the creditors’ rights to participate in a dividend and to obtain a determination of dischargeability are of such importance that their loss mandates exception of a late scheduled debt from discharge.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he key inquiry is whether [the debt- or’s] failure to include [the creditor] on the original schedule of assets and liabilities has deprived him of remedies available under the Bankruptcy Code or whether there was evidence that the exclusion was fraudulent or intentional. Id.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.