In the Matter of Sayyid Mohammed Jawaid Iqbal JAFREE’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2019
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Theard v. United States · Selling v. Radford · Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission · Bernard Selling v. George W Radford · United States v. Provident National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. That the state procedure from want of notice or opportunity to be heard was wanting in due process; 2, that there was such an infirmity of proof as to facts found to have established the want of fair private and professional character as to give rise to a clear conviction on our part that we could not consistently with our duty accept as final the conclusion on that subject; or 3, that some other grave reason existed which should convince us that to allow the natural consequences of the judgment to have their effect would conflict with the duty which rests upon us not to disbar except upon the conviction that, under the principles of right and justice, we were constrained to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“state disbarment proceedings are entitled to great weight and should be relied upon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Attorney discipline in Illinois is a multi-step process,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.