Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

759 F.2d 817

Docket No. 82-8092.

Patterson v. Austin

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1985-04-11

Relies on Stafford v. Oklahoma · United Steelworkers of America v. Weber · System Federation No. 91 v. Wright

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1985-04-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2015

2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING & SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 2, 11 Cir., 1984, 728 F.2d 1389).

Before RONEY and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON*, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The court's consideration of the respondent's petition for rehearing en banc was postponed until a decision by the en banc court in Davis v. Kemp, 752 F.2d 1515 (11th Cir. En Banc 1985). In light of that decision and the opinion accompanying it, the petition for rehearing is DENIED and since no member of this panel nor other Judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

*

Honorable Floyd R. Gibson, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

/759/f2d/817 · .json · Public domain