Ameur v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
759 F.3d 317 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 801 (Military Justice Act of 1968) · 10 U.S.C. § 948A (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B
Relies on United States v. Booker · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · United States v. Jackson · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“words [in judicial] opinions are to be read in the light of the facts of the case under discussion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, we must strike any provisions that are not themselves constitutionally valid ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Fitzgerald v. Alcorn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.