King v. Burwell’s Empirical Analysis
759 F.3d 358 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 36B · 26 U.S.C. § 5000A · 26 U.S.C. § 7422 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 18032 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Duncan v. Walker · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“looks to the 'plain meaning' of the statute to determine if the regulation responds to it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“ambiguous and subject to at least two different interpretations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“given the importance of the tax credits to the overall statutory scheme, it is reasonable to assume that Congress created the ambiguity in this case with at least some degree of intentionality.” 759 F.3d at 373 n. 4. This court disagrees, for the reasons stated. .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.