United States v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
759 F.3d 486 · 2014
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Alleyne v. United States · United States v. Isgar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under Rule 404(b) hinges on whether (1) it is relevant to an issue other than the defendant's character, and (2) it 'possess[es] probative value that is not substantially outweighed by its undue prejudice' under Federal Rule of Evidence 403.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“does not render all prior narcotics convictions per se admissible in a drug conspiracy case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that a prior conviction is relevant and admissible under 404(b).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.