Havens v. Mabus’s Empirical Analysis
759 F.3d 91 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1201 · 10 U.S.C. § 1208 · 10 U.S.C. § 1216 · 10 U.S.C. § 14506 · 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2501
Relies on Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. · Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. · Martinez v. United States · Prakash v. American University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a subsequent lawsuit will be barred if there has been prior litigation (1) involving the same claims or cause of action, (2) between the same parties or their privies, and (3) there has been a final, valid judgment on the merits, (4) by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Secretary of a military department may correct any military record of the Secretary’s department when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice,” and these corrections are generally made”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We conclude by noting that the district court improperly dismissed appellant's suit with prejudice. As appellees concede, dismissals for lack of jurisdiction are not decisions on the merits ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baltimore v. Pruitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.