Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 FSUPP 19 - Martin v. Stone

Martin v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2012
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Bois v. Marsh · Hayes v. Secretary of Defense · 534 F. Supp. 590 - Kolesa v. Lehman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he plaintiff asserts that resort to the Board should not be required in this case since the Board would merely be revisiting the issues already considered by the Secretary. Providing agencies with a “useful, second look at an important decision,” however, is one of the justifications for the exhaustion requirement. Kolesa v. Lehman, 534 F.Supp. 590, 595 (N.D.N.Y.1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.