Ivey v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Delaware State College v. Ricks · Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if no sanction may be imposed for failure to comply with the administrative regulations, they would be rendered meaningless, thereby frustrating the goals of the administrative process. The unreasonableness of such a result indicates that the Lang-ford holding should be confined to the circumstances in that case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where a plaintiff elects to bypass the administrative process in whole or in part, he must comply with the notice requirement of § 633a(d) or face dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Such notice shall be filed within one hundred and eighty days after the alleged unlawful practice occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.