Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 N.E.2d 665 - Marshall v. State

Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wooley v. State · Biggs v. State · Wheeler v. State · Games v. Elkhart Office of Family & Children · Denney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o put the defendants in a position whereby they must either go to trial unprepared due to the State's failure to respond to discovery requests or be prepared to waive their rights to a speedy trial, is to put the defendants in an untenable situation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If any defendant held in jail on an indictment or an affidavit shall move for an early trial, he shall be discharged if not brought to trial within seventy (70) calendar days from the date of such motion, except where a continuance within said period is had on his motion, or the delay is otherwise caused by his act, or where there was not sufficient time to try him during such seventy (70) calendar days because of the congestion of the court calendar.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a defendant cannot be charged with the delay if the defendant made his motion because the State failed to comply with a discovery request.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.