Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Oregon v. Elstad · Connecticut v. Barrett · VanWoundenberg v. State · Cooper v. State · Luker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he error complained of was invited by the appellant's counsel. Therefore, he cannot be heard to complain, on appeal, that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear this testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“ordinarily one [which is] reversible error despite the weight and admissibility of additional evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.