Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 So. 2d 1264 - Lee v. State

759 So. 2d 1264 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Barker v. Wingo · Gerstein v. Pugh · 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State · 512 So. 2d 868 - Williamson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the defendant has not caused the delay and the State does not show good cause for that delay, this Court weighs this factor against the prosecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.