Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 759 So. 2d 286 - State v. Wesley

759 So. 2d 286 - State v. Wesley’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey · 438 So. 2d 1091 - State v. Johnson · 683 So. 2d 218 - State v. Strickland · 338 So. 2d 107 - State v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Except as may be provided by local rules of court in accordance with Articles 522 and 551, a defendant charged with a felony shall be present: (4) At all times during the trial when the court is determining and ruling on the admissibility of evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Presence of the defendant is a condition of due process to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “There is no jurisprudence, or specific statutory provision that requires the defendant's presence at a bench conference in order to satisfy Article 831.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.