759 So. 2d 504 - Hubbert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Doyle v. Ohio · Gilbert v. California · South Dakota v. Neville · Cupp v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the chemicals sought to be found on Hubbert’s hand could have been easily and quickly destroyed, the officers would have been within their rights to swab Hubbert’s hand even over his objections.” (citation omitted)); Walker v. Mississippi, 759 So.2d 422, 426 (Miss.Ct.App.1999) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.