Farrill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

cited by 4 later decisions

states following

December 2003

most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 513 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fundora

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“not only strikingly similar, but they must also share some unique characteristic or combination of characteristics which sets them apart from other offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 811 So. 2d 714 - Morman v. State
“My neighbor's dog bit me once. I avoid that dog. No one thinks my use of propensity logic in the matter of the dog is inappropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. 780 So. 2d 106 - Robertson v. State
“relevant to a material fact such as identity, intent, motive, opportunity, plan, knowledge, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 811 So. 2d 714 - Morman v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.