Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 A3D 883 - Abdelrhman v. Ackerman

Abdelrhman v. Ackerman’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

14 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United States v. Atlantic Research Corp. · 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc. · Dyer v. Bilaal · A/S Apothekernes Laboratorium for Specialpraeparater v. I.M.C. Chemical Group, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has long employed an objective law of contracts, meaning that the written language embodying the terms of an agreement will govern the rights and liabilities of the parties [regardless] of the intent of the parties at the time they entered into the contract, unless the written language is not susceptible of a clear and definite undertaking, or unless there is fraud, duress, or mutual mistake.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he proper interpretation of a contract”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In the interpretation of a promise or agreement or a term thereof, the following standards of preference are generally applicable: (a) an interpretation which gives a reasonable, lawful, and effective meaning to all the terms is preferred to an interpretation which leaves a part unreasonable, unlawful, or of no effect; (b) express terms are given greater weight than course of performance, course of dealing, and usage of trade, course of performance is given greater weight than course of dealing or usage of trade, and course of dealing is given greater weight than usage of trade; (c) specific terms and exact terms are-given greater weight than general language; (d) separately negotiated or added terms are given greater weight than standardized terms or other terms not separately negotiated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.