Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 Ariz. 7 - State v. Tracy

State v. Tracy’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 1979
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 38 · 43 U.S.C. § 870

Relies on Belk v. Meagher · United States v. Sweet · Noonan v. Caledonia Gold Min Co · California v. Deseret Water, Oil & Irrigation Co. · 17 Cal. App. 540 - Garibaldi v. Grillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * A mining claim to be valid must be filed upon public land open and subject to entry at the time the location is made. * * * Belk v. Meagher, 104 U.S. 279 , 26 L.Ed. 735 ; McKenzie v. Moore, 20 Ariz. 1 , 176 P. 568 . Lindley on Mines, 3rd edition, §§ 183, 184, et seq., makes it clear that a valid claim to mineral land could not be initiated on an Indian Reservation as ‘The lands embraced therein are no longer public lands’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The documentary evidence in the record —affidavits of performance of annual labor and a notice of intention to hold mining claim—is incomplete and does not present even prima facie proof of ‘possession and working of the claims’ for a full five-year period * * *." 76 Ariz. at 12 , 257 P.2d at 863 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * This school section * * became the property of the State of Arizona * * *. It is evident, and we so hold, that these claims are void and of no effect as the lands were not then subject to location as a part of the public domain of the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.