In Re Keul’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2012
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on In Re Keziah · Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement Fund v. Durkalec (In Re Durkalec) · Matter of Patton · In Re Denson · North Star Diamond Co. v. Brusich & St. Pedro Jewelers, Inc. (In Re Brusich & St. Pedro Jewelers, Inc.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n order granting relief from stay is subject to being altered or vacated pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) and Bankr. Rule 9024.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.