In Re McCollum’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corp. (1997), Jones v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Jones) (2007)
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Ellis v. Parr (In Re Ellis ) · In Re Gavia · In Re Elsub Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a creditor is adequately protected by a large equity cushion and the debtor could suffer a substantial loss in the event of foreclosure, it does not appear that relief from stay should automatically follow a default in payment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A postpetition default may, or may not, constitute 'cause' for relief from stay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The starting point for the analysis is the goal of chapter 13 to rehabilitate the debtor while protecting the creditor’s interests. To further that goal, § 1329 provides for modification of a plan after confirmation to take into account changed circumstances. See 11 U.S.C. 1329(a). The determination of whether the proposed modification should be approved is based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the proposed modification. H.R.Rep. No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 431 (1977), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1978, p. 5787.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.