Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 CAL 181 - Copertini v. Oppermann

Copertini v. Oppermann’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
August 1951
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1951

14 state decisions

4018881890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holman v. Taylor · Schroeder v. Wittram

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The words `good title' import that the owner has the title, legal and equitable, to all the land, and the words `defective title' mean that the party claiming to own has not the whole title, but some other person has title to a part or portion of the land.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.