76 Cal. App. 19 - Ruppe v. Utter’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co. (1947), 116 Cal. App. 2d 615 - Vangel v. Vangel (1953)
3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Randol v. Scott · 11 Cal. App. 321 - Spangler v. Spangler · 24 Cal. App. 319 - Donleavey v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is property recognized and protected by the law as such.... How far its value might be affected by the competition of the retiring partner is an element, of course, to be taken into consideration in fixing of such value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.