Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 CALAPP2D 471 - Martin v. Ray

Martin v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 1978
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1978

16 state decisions

801946195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Werner v. Graham · Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn. · Marra v. Aetna Construction Co. · Berryman v. Hotel Savoy Company · McBride v. Freeman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * To create an equitable servitude in the grant or lands in a large area, it is essential that there must be a general scheme of restrictions sufficiently uniform in character to indicate unmistakably a designated and adopted plan throughout common to all purchasers of lots. The restrictions must not only appear in one deed, but in all the deeds, * * *. In other words, the restrictions must be for the mutual benefit of all parcel owners and each lot imposed with a servitude for the benefit of each and every other lot. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This whole discussion may in fact be summed up in the single statement that, if the parties desire to create mutual rights in real property of the character of those claimed here, they must say so, and must say it in the only place where it can be given legal effect, namely, in the written instruments exchanged between them, which constitute the final expression of their understanding. * * * ” 181 Cal. at 185 , 183 P. at 949 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.