76 Cal. App. 4th 1322 - Giuffre v. Sparks’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 194 - Skelly v. State Personnel Board · 2 Cal. 4th 556 - Burden v. Snowden · 32 Cal. 3d 128 - Baggett v. Gates · 31 Cal. 3d 676 - White v. County of Sacramento · 20 Cal. 4th 805 - Fukuda v. City of Angels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]t minimum, section 3304 requires that a peace officer receive an evidentiary hearing before a neutral fact finder to challenge the punitive action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sworn testimony and cross-examination of witnesses, or presentation of argument by the city to which Runyan and his counsel could respond.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is only where the peace officer is an at-will employee that courts have found no absolute right to a full evidentiary hearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.