Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 Colo. 164 - Catlin v. Moynihan

Catlin v. Moynihan’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1928
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cascade Auto Co. v. Petter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We said, in Auto Co. v. Petter , 72 Colo. 570 , 212 Pac. 823 , that `a request by each party for a directed verdict is equivalent to a stipulation that the facts may be found by the court. The court's finding, thereupon made, is conclusive if there is evidence to support it.' There was some conflict in the testimony, but there was abundant evidence to justify the finding in favor of plaintiff below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.