Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 Conn. App. 779 - State v. Ward

76 Conn. App. 779 - State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · State v. Golding · Strobel v. Strobel · State v. Sinclair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The proper appellate standard of review when considering the action of a trial court granting or denying a motion to set aside a verdict and a motion for a new trial is the abuse of discretion standard.... In determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion, every reasonable presumption should be given in favor of the correctness of the court's ruling.... Reversal is required only where an abuse of discretion is manifest or where injustice appears to have been done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.