¶1Petition tor Mandamus from the Northern District of Ohio.
¶2Henry W. Blodgett, Ephraim Banning, and Thomas Banning, for petitioner. Bakewell & Bakewell, for respondent.
¶3No opinion. Denied.
76 F. 1006
Docket No. 435.
Ex parte Stirling Co.
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 1896.)
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1896-06-15
<p>Petition tor Mandamus from the Northern District of Ohio.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1896
1 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1896-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →