Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 F.1d 456 - Seabury v. Johnson

Seabury v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

76 F. 456 · 1896

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 1906
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. Ortmayer · White v. Dunbar · Keystone Bridge Company v. Phoenix Iron Company · Railroad Company v. Mellon · Stirling Co. v. Pierpoint Boiler Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the patentee may have been unfortunate in the language he has chosen to express his actual invention, and may have been entitled to a broader claim, we are not at liberty, without running counter to the entire current of authority in thisv court, to construe such claims to include more than their language fairly imports. Nothing is better settled in the law of patents than that the patentee may claim the whole or only a part of his invention, and that, if he only describe and claim a part, he is presumed to have abandoned the residue to the public.” Citing Railroad Co. v. Mellon. 104 U. S. 112 , 26 L. Ed. 639 ; Merrill v. Yeomans, 94 U. S. 568 , 24 L. Ed. 235 ; Burns v. Meyer, 100 U. S. 671 . 25 L. Ed. 738 ; Sutter v. Robinson, 119 U. S. 530 , 7 Sup. Ct. 376 , 30 L. Ed. 492 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(1) A sulphur candle, provided with a surrounding band of metal, projecting slightly above the upper side or end of the main portion or body of the said candle, substantially as described.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.