Gray v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
76 F. 525 · 1896
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2012
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kent v. . Church of St. Michael · Easton v. Montgomery · Eddy v. . Davis · Mead v. Parker · Dresel v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““San Francisco. October 7th, .1891. “I hereby agree to sell my lot 82 V12 feet, on south side of Market street, immediately east and adjoining the Central Park, between 7th and Sth streets, and running through to Stevenson street, in the rear, to Edgar Mills, for one hundred and sixty-five thousand dollars, 17. S. gold coin (S165,000), payable on delivery of deed after examination of title, say, fifteen days from date. The purchaser to pay half of the taxes for the current year. “Jos. A. Donohoe, Sr., “Per J. A. Donohoe, Jr.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gray v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.