76 F.2d 1002
Docket No. 7719.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1935.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1935-05-02
2 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1935-05-02
Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1995
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Wm. P. Mealey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
¶2Julius V. Patrosso, Dave F. Smith, Call & Murphey, Alex W. Davis, J. R. Wilder, J. Widoff, and Carroll Allen, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
¶3Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.
¶5Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.