Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.2d 1009

Docket No. 7665.

Fleishhacker v. Barde

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1935.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1935-05-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1936

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1935-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Young, Hudson & Rabinowitz and Mc-Kinstry, Haber & Coombes, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

¶2Dunne, Dunne & Cook and Arthur B. Dunne, all of San Francisco, Cal., and Dey, Ilampson & Nelson, of Portland, Or., for appellees.

¶3Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon stipulation of counsel fo'r respective parties, ordered judgment of District Court affirmed; mandate forthwith.

/76/f2d/1009 · .json · Public domain